“Personalized learning” creates a buzz in people’s minds when they don’t have ideas of it. To make our learning experience more interactive and creative, we need a revolution in positive aspects. The concept of personalized learning is more than a trend now; it enhances and amplifies the level of understanding and learning especially for students. If you recall your figures, you remember that Mark and Priscilla Zuckerberg have discussed their investment in software development in December 2015 for understanding the best way to learn something and where you need to pay attention. There are three initiatives based on the same concept have started by the Gate Foundation:
- Next Generation Learning Challenges (NGLC)
- Charter School Growth Fund’s Next Generation School Investments
- The Gates Foundation’s Personalized Learning Pilots
Now, you can imagine the significance and desirability of personalized learning. When you consider the perspective of the Northwest Evaluation Association’s (NWEA) members, then you realize that there is no pattern define to express the tools, approaches, and methods of personalized learning in actual practice. Before coming to any conclusion, let’s discuss some facts about personalized learning.
Learning is all about enhancing an individual’s skills and abilities. If you work for enhancing your abilities, you must pay attention to your personalized learning. Personal learning or personalization describes different types of education learning, academic-assistance tactics, education program, and informative approaches to address peers’ learning requirements and goals.
What is personalized learning?
Till yet, you will not find any specific definition for personalized learning (PL). Researchers put their effort to define PL based on conversations with experts and specialists in the field.
Personalized learning: It defines a clear understanding of the objectives and requirements of each student and the modifying instruction to address those requirements and goals. To fulfill these goals and requirements, students and teachers both require to put their effort in the right direction. And, the progress toward meeting these objectives are highly visible and easily accessible to both parties (students and their families, and teachers).
Many U.S. schools make sure that all scholars work for grade-level standards, get the same progress as their grade-level peers, and prepare for their examination at the end of the session. For more clarification, read the following key findings:
- Early findings of personalized learning reflect an improvement in achievement for students, irrespective of their preliminary level of achievement.
- You may not find prompt benefits of PL but studies suggest more positive effects of implementing PL in schools.
- It is quite tough to understand which approaches are most effective or what strategies must be implemented to maximize the benefits of PL.
Another important thing that plays a significant role in the process is technology. If teachers use technologies properly to understand the complexity of the personalization process, then they can allow students to meet their education goals. It also helps peers to learn individually and work at their own pace. Using technology, educators can get a more personalized approach to amplify their teaching experience and provide better assistance for student’s learning and development. For example, you can finish your assignment smartly using online assignment help services to shows the best use of technology in the learning process.
To understand how personalized learning can change the students’ life, you need to consider the following benefits:
Visible changes in mathematics students:
According to data of approximately 5,500 students in 32 NGLC schools who joined the Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) mathematics and reading assessments for one year (2014 to 2015), a visible difference is noticed. Researchers also compare the scores with those students who didn’t attend the same program.
This figure shows the effect size is approx. 0.09 in mathematics and 0.07 in reading. You can find a significant change in only mathematics students. The effect sizes interpret profit of about 3 percentile points.
Better results are shown by charter schools than districts school
If you compare, you will find more positive effects in the majority of schools whereas few schools were shows negative effects on students’ achievement. Data of eight NGLC schools operated by school districts and 24 charter schools are compared based on students’ achievement.
All high schools and middle schools are considered under district schools whereas the charter schools consisted of all grade levels schools. This analysis shows separate average treatment effects for the district as well as charter schools.
The above figure shows the estimated effects for district-operated and charter schools for the academic year 2014-2015. The district-operated schools show zero reading estimates and have smaller estimates in both subjects. As there are small samples of district schools, the estimates are particularly indefinite.
The charter schools showed similar results in both mathematics and reading having estimated effects near 0.10.
Effects and implications of personalized learning
After considering both analyses of district-operated and charter schools, you find the reasons for implementing personalized learning to enhance students’ learning experience. You also need to consider the following implications to understand the significance of PL in schools and amplify learning experience.
- Personalized learning is capable of enlightening students’ achievement
If you consider early facts and evidence, you will find that PL allows students to improve their level of achievement. Though, more-rigorous experimental study designs must be required to confirm the outcomes. Furthermore, the process of implementing PL in schools is in the initial stages of development and require to use various practices to achieve the greatest impact.
- The effects of personalized learning vary according to contexts
The positive outcomes of PL vary for individual schools and also consider some schools that showed negative effects as well. Thus, it is quite challenging to measure results for PL implementation which may be greater in some contexts.
- Personalized learning requires some time to develop
The two-year analyses suggest the benefits of personalized learning and its positive effects if schools have implemented PL for at least one year. It is still in examine mode to calculate the effects of PL over longer durations because schools and students acquire experience with this major change to schooling. We need to consider all minute things for enhancing the experience of personalized learning to get great benefits such as changes in curriculums, approaches for better learning, strategies and so on.